Waiting for God? DON'T!

We have all heard mature Christians state, "I'm waiting for God...." This is often followed by a sigh with or without a shrug of the shoulders. What does waiting for God produce in you? (Christian-speak translation: What is the fruit?)

 

 

Feeling impatient?  Feel your time is being wasted?

 

 

Feeling bored, not knowing what to do?

 

 Feeling rejected, forgotten or unimportant?

 

Maybe you don't have any of the reactions above.  Then likely the best you can come up with is that it bears no good fruit.  Either way there is no benefit, so why not stop saying, "I'm waiting for God"?

There is a another way that better communicates the waiting and produces good fruit.  Instead just say:

I'm waiting with God.

Our minds have been trained to associate waiting for someone as that someone is not there.  However, saying "I'm waiting with God" reminds you of the basic fact of New Testament Christianity that God is always with you.  It reminds you that Christ abides in you.  The Holy Spirit is not only always with you but always in you!  Sometimes we do feel that God is somewhere else.  This feeling is real but it is not reality.  This feeling lies to you.  You need to constantly and persistently remind yourself of the truth that God is always with you.  That is why you need to say, "I'm waiting with God."

Furthermore, this produces even more good fruit in your soul when you also remember that God loves you. He is crazy about you and wants you to have good things.  He wants good things for you that you never even thought of.  

An all-knowing God wants these good things even more than you do!

So if the God who created you has to wait to fulfill His desire to give you the best with the best of timing, shouldn't you consider it an honor to wait with Him?

So let's all renew (i.e., retrain) our minds.  Let's stop waiting for God and instead enjoy the privilege of waiting with God.  

Just a suggestion . . . .

Democracy prevails

President Trump is an embarrassment. He and those supporters that are still disputing the election are enemies of democracy, the rule of law, and the Constitution. Quite frankly, they are no better than traitors. To those offended by this I suggest to prayerfully consider 1st Samuel 15:23a.

I agree with everything President-elect Biden said below on Monday evening, December 14th.

Want to see the year of jubilee?

Some folks asked me, an economist, to explain the relevance of the Year of Jubilee and the impact of applying it today.  It may seem a bit pedantic, but I need to build up to the answer.  First, let’s look at what Jubilee was in the Bible.  Next, let’s explain what it wasn’t in the Bible.  Third, how do we apply it today?

What’s the Bible say?  The Year of Jubilee is explained in Leviticus 25:9-55. Please take a moment, click the preceding link, and read it. To see what is actually written in the Bible is of the upmost importance.  You should want God’s Word, not what others want you to think it means.

STOP!  Did you really read the passage?

Yeah, it is a long passage.  I know it is hard, but you can do it.  So MAN UP!  (Grow a couple.)  Click: Leviticus 25:9-55.  Let’s do this right!  If you can’t be bothered, then please stop reading this and go back to looking at cat videos and pictures of other people’s food on Facebook.

Highlights Concerning Property in Leviticus 25:

• Land was an inheritance from God and could not be sold outright (v. 23).
• Land could be “sold” but the owner or a relative could redeem it, or buy it back (v. 25).
• The price of the land, and the price to redeem it, was based on how many years were left until the year of Jubilee (v. 26-27).
• If no one redeemed it, then in the Year of Jubilee the land would revert to the original owner since it is his inheritance from the Lord (v. 28).
• A house in a walled city could be sold in perpetuity but the owner had a right to redeem it only during the first year after the sale (v. 29-30).

Highlights Concerning People in Leviticus 25:

•  Lending or selling for profit to an Israelite in need was prohibited (v. 35-37).
• A poor Israelite could not sell himself and his family into slavery to another Israelite.  He must be treated as a hired hand and only required to serve until the Year of Jubilee (v. 39-40).
• The Year of Jubilee did not apply to non-Israelites (sojourners and foreigners).  They could be bought and sold as slaves and owned in perpetuity (v. 44-46).
•  A poor Israelite could sell himself and his family into slavery to a non-Israelite but only until the Year of Jubilee (v. 47, 54)
•  All Israelites could be redeemed, whether serving as a hired worker to another Israelite or as a slave to a non-Israelite (v. 48-49).
• As with land, the redemption price was based on how many years were left until the Year of Jubilee (v. 50-52).

Financially, the Year of Jubilee applies to two things:  the debts of Israelites repaid with labor, and the land that God gave as an inheritance to the Israelites.  First, non-Israelite slaves were not set free.  The Jubilee only applied to slaves who were Israelites.  The Children of Israel belonged to God.  They could not sell themselves into perpetual slavery because they were not their own, but God’s property.  Second, the land was a gift from God, an inheritance, bequeathed with the unchangeable restriction that it was the permanent possession of the Children of Israel.  In short, they could not sell it outright.  It is like Canton’s Village Park which is actually owned by the Presbyterian Church.  It was bequeathed to the church with a restrictive covenant that it could not be sold.  The church cannot give the land title to the Village of Canton and be done with it, even with the guarantee of its continued use as a park.  Neither could the Children of Israel sell their land in perpetuity. 

What’s NOT in the Bible?  An implication of the above is that none of the following has anything to do with the Year of Jubilee:

• Cancel all debts!
• Stop the foreclosures!
•  Free those in financial bondage!

You might be thinking that although it may not literally be in the Bible, can’t the Year of Jubilee be an application of biblical principles that are indicative of God’s desire, his heart for social justice for those in financial bondage?

No.

Why not?  The short answer is because such an application uses the Bible to deny, even pervert, the picture of God’s mercy, love and holiness.

(As you might suspect, the long answer is to follow.)

In Leviticus 25 the Jubilee requires neither the renunciation of debts nor the nullification of agreements or contracts.  The agreement to the sale of land is not voided by the Jubilee because there never was a sale in perpetuity.  It is very clear that both sides were to understand up front that purchasing use of the land was only temporary until a buyback (redemption) or until the Year of Jubilee.  God said, “And if you make a sale to your neighbor or buy from your neighbor, you shall not wrong one another” (v. 14) when outlining the amount of the sale and the redemption prices.  Likewise, the obligation of a hired man or an Israelite slave to work was also known to everyone involved to be temporary until a buyback or the Year of Jubilee.

Of course there are numerous Bible verses concerning the forgiveness, including the forgiveness of debt.  However, the admonition to forgive debts is always to the lender not the borrower.  Forgiveness is voluntary, not imposed by a third party, and certainly not by God.

No one is entitled to receive forgiveness.

God is a promise keeper, not a promise breaker.  He will not coerce a lender to accept another person’s violation of an agreement.  God is all powerful but not unrighteous.

How Do We Apply the Year of Jubilee Today?  The Year of Jubilee presents a beautiful picture of God’s love for his people.  The Children of Israel received an inheritance of land from God.  God guaranteed this inheritance would be restored even if someone purposed to lose it.  Children of Israel may put themselves into slavery but God guaranteed they would be restored.  They were His.

Today each of us was once part of a people who were not His people.  With our sin, we each sold ourselves into slavery.  We belonged to Satan and he was not about to forgive our sins and set us free.  Rather, Jesus redeemed us.  Satan was not forced to renounce his hold over us.  We were not stolen from Satan as a result of the coercion of an all-power God.  Rather, Jesus redeemed us.  The price for sin was death but Jesus paid the price for our sins, life for life, with his own blood.  There is no entitlement to receive such forgiveness.  Rather, Jesus redeemed us.
.

Since Jesus redeemed us, we are now the Children of God by adoption.  We are his and he can renounce the debt of sin because he paid for it.  God owns us and we cannot change that even if we want to because we are not our own but were bought with a price.

In accepting Christ's redemption, we are co-heirs with Jesus.  We cannot lose our inheritance.

Jubilee is not about a Get-Out-of-Debt-Free Card.  It is all about Jesus.  Jesus is our Jubilee.

Astros v. Dodgers and the randomness of baseball

At one win apiece for the Astros and Dodgers, in about three hours we have the start of what is a best three-of-five World Series. IMHO the best predictor of a winner between these two 100-plus-game-winning teams is a fair coin toss. If that is so (and it is) then there is a decent chance that this will end with Sunday night's Game 5. That decent chance is one-in-four or 25%. Why? Whoever wins tonight has the equivalent of two subsequent coin tosses coming up heads of being WORLD CHAMPION before ever having to leave Houston to play again in LA. If this happens then the talking-head analysts and commentators (i.e., blowhards) will explain why such a one-sided, 4-to-1 series was inevitable. How one team choked, blah, blah, blah, and how the other came through in the clutch.

A just as good or better explanation is that the championship was the result of what is, not to be too technical, called Dumb Luck.

Of course there is a 3-in-4 or 75% chance that there will be a Game 6 Tuesday night in LA. The dream of the dreams of Fox TV executives, the guaranteed high-ratings fall event, Game 7, has a better than 1-in-3 (37%) chance of also happening.

Again the expensive suit-and-tie wearing Big Boys, ex-players all, will pontificate as to why it all happened and do so with all the absolute certainty obtainable with 20-20 hindsight.

These well-paid, self-satisfied Big Boys with Big Mouths get the Big Bucks while Lady Luck only gets ignored. Talk about Gender Inequality!

So relax and take in two great teams playing each other. Take in baseball’s ultimate emotional roller coast ride with the thrills, disappointments, randomness, and joy called the World Series. It doesn’t get better than this -- especially if you don’t pay too much attention to the talking heads.

Just do what Mr. Puig #66 would do: Enjoy the game.

A little Q & A....featuring answer man Ernie Miller.

Q: So. What do you say to God when you're a total failure? What do you say to Him when you want something you don't think He wants for you? What do you say to Him when you don't even know if your thinking is correct or right? How about this: What do you say to Him when you know where you are coming from is wrong? How do you handle the anger? How do you handle the disappointment? You know the truth but you do not want to submit? I'm not asking you, because you don't know the answer. But, think of it. Have you been there? Have you been in the place where you KNOW what your doing or thinking is wrong, yet, you continue in it? Does that thing have a hold on you and you don't want to give it up? What do you do? You say you love God but you continue in doing that which He hates. Who are you? What are you? What are your choices in this situation? I can hear the answers of the legalistic. But what does God say? How does He handle someone who is in that place? It is easy to speak platitudes. But, in the end, the heart is evil and desperately wicked without Him. (OK, for all of you who don't acknowledge Him I am not quite sure what you would say.) So? What is a follower of Christ? What should that person look like? And further, what is the person that DOESN'T look like it? Jesus said that "His" road is narrow and that few go by that way.

A: ...[T]hese things are not a surprise to the Lord ..actually they are the plight of every man . Somehow we decide what to allow in our lives, our thoughts, our hearts, and when a whole group of people agree on these things ...you have religion . Yet Gods standard is perfection. Thank him for being able to see in such a way, many cannot . But this is the very thing Christ died for. When we admit were not willing, our hearts are far from Him...this is the very truth He is looking for .

And what does a Christian look like...blameless before our God..for the blood of Christ is sufficient ..nay more than sufficient

So many preach holiness and righteousness and to that I say Amen. But even to those the truth is this...holiness and righteousness is not only a thing of the past , but of the present and of tomorrow..and what will a man do not for yesterday's sins, but tomorrow's? Shall his holiness save him ? Or will He call out for the mercy and grace of our Lord? There's no other way. For its by grace alone that we are saved and by grace alone that we stand...so no man may boast .

SOURCE:  Copied and pasted without permission from a Facebook page without attribution. This does not constitute plagiarism since I do not claim authorship. I stole it!  

fb the day after

I am so tired of all the anger, accusations, outrage, contrived victim-hood, and more.  I thought it was just the election bringing out the worst in us.  Now the election is over, but it is continuing.   Now I am beginning to see that it is not the election, it is us.

What is the source of all the filth we see and hear?  Jesus said, "For out of the abundance of the heart the mouth speaks" (Mt 12:34).  The problem with America isn't the media, the candidates,  the President, the President-elect, or those in Washington.  It is us.  We are merely seeing some evidence, the tip of the iceberg, the overflow of the reservoir of filth within us.

This is not the way to act after an election.  It is destructive to a democratic society.  It is not only rude, but unpatriotic and un-American.  "If we can't begin to treat each other in a more human way, this thing is going to go from bad to horrible."

"I'm Bob Blewett and I approve this message."

fb the day after

I am so tired of all the anger, accusations, outrage, contrived victim-hood, and more.  I thought it was just the election bringing out the worst in us.  Now the election is over, but it is continuing.   Now I am beginning to see that it is not the election, it is us.

What is the source of all the filth we see and hear?  Jesus said, "For out of the abundance of the heart the mouth speaks" (Mt 12:34).  The problem with America isn't the media, the candidates,  the President, the President-elect, or those in Washington.  It is us.  We are merely seeing some evidence, the tip of the iceberg, the overflow of the reservoir of filth within us.

This is not the way to act after an election.  It is destructive to a democratic society.  It is not only rude, but unpatriotic and un-American.  "If we can't begin to treat each other in a more human way, this thing is going to go from bad to horrible."

"I'm Bob Blewett and I approve this message."

Voting for evil or voting for what American can be

The following quote is from a video I just watched:

“I will vote to oppose the loss of freedom.  I will vote to oppose the loss of life.  And I will vote to oppose the loss of the traditional family.”

 ~ Tommy Nelson, The Continental Divide 

After some reflection I realize that the sentences above are each negative votes  They are votes of opposition, even votes of fear.  They are defensive.  They are truly votes of protest rather than affirmations of what America can be as a country.  

Maybe we should take a different approach to voting.

As for me, I will vote for one who will support and defend the Constitution.  I will vote for one who will submit to the Constitution as written and to the rule of law.  I will vote for one who does not wink at political corruption as the art of a deal or as a convenient means to an end.

 

Thereby I will vote to support freedom.

As for me, I will vote for one who values all human life since all human life is made in the image of God.  I will vote for one who respects the human rights of all citizens and residents regardless of their race, ethnicity, or national origin, as well as regardless of their religious, political, or social views and beliefs.

Thereby, I will vote to value life and the dignity of people.

As for me, I will vote for a person of competence and character to have the job of President.  I will vote for one competent to deal with Congress, to be commander-in-chief of the military, to be effective in both domestic and foreign affairs.  I will vote for someone I can best trust to lead us through still dangerous times.

Thereby, I will vote to support a better America and a safer world.

After reading the above, you may think me an incredibly self-righteous ass.  Be that as it may, I still have the problem of deciding for whom to vote.  I want my vote to count, to be tallied or enumerated, as well as to count for something important, something positive, something bigger than myself.

Neither of the two leading candidates meet, neither fails to meet, all my criteria.  All candidates are flawed human beings, but I sincerely believe those two are particularly appalling and clearly unfit for the office.  Neither is someone for whom I could vote in good conscience.  Neither am I constrained by the false dilemma of either Clinton or Trump.  In my state I have the option of voting for one out of a total of 36 candidates (four on the ballot, 32 certified for write-ins).

There is one of the 36 that I think is fit for office.  Evan McMullin appears to meet my criteria:  

I am not throwing my vote away voting for McMullin.  Throwing my vote away, as well as selling out my moral values, would be voting for Clinton or Trump.

This is not a “protest” vote.  A protest vote is voting for Trump because you don’t like Clinton or vice versa.  I do not have to vote for the lessor of two evils.  I do not need to settle for voting for evil.  I can vote for Evan McMullin without feeling degraded and ashamed.

In 2016 I do not have to vote for evil, incompetence, or corruption.  I can and will vote for affirmation of what America can be as a country.  I'm voting for Evan McMullin.

Be blessed!

RB

FYI:  Special NYS Rules for Write-in Votes for President

Special NYS Rules for Write-in Votes for President

What to do if you do not want to vote for one of the four candidates for President listed on the ballot in New York?  Of course you can do a write-in vote.  However it must be done correctly or the vote will not count.  Since the President is not elected directly but by electors, rules are different for Presidential write-ins than they are for other offices.

"In order to run as a write-in candidate for President, a person must file a certificate with the State Board of Elections, in which they declare themselves to be a write-in candidate for the office of President" (NYS Board of Election).  If you write-in another name, even a name already on the ballot's list of candidates, the write-in vote will not count.

Here is how it works. "As you sign in to vote, you will be handed a voting card that contains the various offices that you will be voting for.... You will then take this card over to a table that has partitions on it which helps to keep your choices secret. Upon looking at the card, you'll note that each office being contested has the list of the authorized candidates along with a circle next to each name. At the bottom of each list of candidates will be printed the word "Other" with a blank line next to it. Take the marking instrument provided and fill in the circle next to the word "Other". Then write in the name of the person that you wish to vote for. When you are finished, take the card up to the election inspector near the voting machine and give your card to him/her. They will run your card through the machine which will record your vote" (source).

Here is a list of the 32 NYS certified write-in candidates for President:

Arantxa Aranja 725 Ninth Avenue, #2A, New York, NY 10019
Neer R. Asherie 121 Reade Street, PH-H, New York, NY 10013
Mark Blickley 2728 Thomson Avenue, #202, Long Island City, NY 11101
Robert L. Buchanan P. O. Box 6151, Fredericksburg, VA 22403
Gary S. Canns 145 East 23rd Street, #5-D, New York, NY 10010
Willie Carter 5100 Turner Street, Fort Worth, TX 76105
Darrell Castle 2586 Hocksett Cove, Germantown, TN 38139
Ariel Cohen 449 Roy Street, West Hempstead, NY 11552
William J. Connolly 10953 State Route 32, Greenville, NY 12083
“Rocky” Roque De La Fuente 121 Nurmi Drive, Ft. Lauderdale, FL 33301
Jason Fried 757 Jefferson Avenue, Brooklyn, NY 11221
Zoltan Istvan Gyurko 35 Miller Avenue, #102, Mill Valley, CA 94941
Ben Hartnell 1025 Autumn Lake Court, Westerville, OH 43081
Tom Hoefling 101 Third Street, Lohrville, IA 51453
Michael Frederick Ingbar 174 Spring Street, #20, New York, NY 10012
Lynn Kahn 18 Lakeview Way, PO Box 562, Schroon Lake, NY 12870
Chris Keniston 2329 15th Street, Vernon, TX 76384
Gloria La Riva 3207 Mission Street, Apt. 9, San Francisco, CA 94110
Jeffrey Mackler 33 Mandana Circle, Oakland, CA 94610
Michael A. Maturen 3296 East Clemens Road, Harrisville, MI 48740
Evan McMullin 333 Second Street, NE, Washington, DC 20002
Monica Moorehead 37 Bentley Avenue, Jersey City, NJ 07304
Jason Mutford 912 Washington Avenue, Albany, NY 12203
Clifton Roberts 9382 Willow Pond Circle, Elk Grove, CA 95624
Marshall Schoenke 21924 W. Linden Avenue, Lake Villa, IL 60046
Ryan Alan Scott 194 Vincent Circle, Middletown, DE 19709
Emidio Soltysik 11713 Avon Way, #15, Los Angeles, CA 90066
Tony Valdivia 11306 Candle Park, San Antonia, TX 78249
J. J. Vogel-Walcutt 1329 Tall Maple Loop, Oviedo, FL 32765
Esther Welsh 95-20 67th Avenue, Rego Park, NY 11374
Barbara Whitaker 149 West Fourth Street, Apt. 4B, New York, NY 10912
Robert M. Wolff 627 Willoughby Avenue, Brooklyn, NY 11206
 (NYS Board of Election).

The Silence Is Deafening: Zero Support for Trump Among Former Presidential Economic Advisers

Today's Wall Street Journal (Friday 26 August 2016, p. A5) published a survey of all former members of the Council of Economic Advisers (CEA) going back to the Nixon administration.  The CEA was created by the Employment Act of 1946 to advise the President on economic policy and consists of three members appointed by the President.

None of the 45 living former members are willing publicly support Donald Trump.  That is NONE as in ZERO, as in NADA, as in ZILCH. (The results do not indicate whether the non-living former CEA members are, or are not, rolling over in their graves at the prospect of a Trump presidency.)  

While no former member supported the opposition party's candidate, the silence on Trump by economists serving under Republicans is deafening.  Among the Republican-appointed CEA members, all were silent except six, who all opposed Trump.  These six included former CEA chairs who served under Reagan (Martin Feldstein) and Bush #43 (Greg Mankiw).  It is very unusual for advisers to state opposition to the candidate of the party whose President appointed them.

“I have known personally every Republican president since Richard Nixon,” said Harvard University economist Martin Feldstein, who chaired the council under President Ronald Reagan. “They all showed a real understanding of economics and international affairs….Donald Trump does not have that understanding and does not seem to be concerned about it. That alone disqualifies him in my judgment.”  

Source:  http://blogs.wsj.com/economics/2016/08/25/economists-whove-advised-presidents-are-no-fans-of-donald-trump/